Skip to content

[CSDiagnostics] Teach diagnoseConflictingGenericArguments about holes #65479

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2023

Conversation

xedin
Copy link
Contributor

@xedin xedin commented Apr 27, 2023

Only fully resolved substitutions are eligible to be considered as conflicting,
if holes are involved in any position that automatically disqualifies a generic parameter.

Resolves: rdar://108534555
Resolves: #63450

Only fully resolved substitutions are eligible to be considered
as conflicting, if holes are involved in any position that automatically
disqualifies a generic parameter.

Resolves: rdar://108534555
Resolves: swiftlang#63450
@xedin
Copy link
Contributor Author

xedin commented Apr 27, 2023

@swift-ci please test

@xedin
Copy link
Contributor Author

xedin commented Apr 28, 2023

@swift-ci please build toolchain macOS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Conflicting arguments to generic parameter 'Content' ('<<hole>>' vs. '<<hole>>' vs. '<<hole>>' …
1 participant