Merge pull request MicrosoftDocs#4433 from MugBergerFries/patch-2

Updated C26495

Author: JamesJBarnett

docs/code-quality/c26495.md

@@ -1,21 +1,25 @@
 ---
 title: C26495
-ms.date: 05/23/2022
+ms.date: 08/18/2022
 ms.topic: reference
-f1_keywords: ["C26495"]
+f1_keywords: ["C26495", "MEMBER_UNINIT", "__WARNING_MEMBER_UNINIT"]
 helpviewer_keywords: ["C26495"]
 description: CppCoreCheck rule that enforces C++ Core Guidelines Type.6
 ---
-# C26495 MEMBER_UNINIT
+# Warning C26495
 
-> Variable '*identifier*' is uninitialized. Always initialize a member variable (type.6).
+> Variable '\**parameter-name*' is uninitialized. Always initialize a member variable (type.6).
 
 ## Remarks
 
 A member variable isn't initialized by a constructor or by an initializer. Make sure all variables are initialized by the end of construction. For more information, see C++ Core Guidelines [Type.6](https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#SS-type) and [C.48](https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#c48-prefer-in-class-initializers-to-member-initializers-in-constructors-for-constant-initializers).
 
+Code analysis name: MEMBER_UNINIT
+
 ## Example
 
+The following sample generates warning C26495 because the member variable `value` isn't initialized when a `MyStruct` object is created.
+
 ```cpp
 struct MyStruct
 {
@@ -24,12 +28,12 @@ struct MyStruct
 };
 ```
 
-To fix the warning, add in-class initialization to all of the member variables:
+To resolve the issue, you can add in-class initialization to all of the member variables.
 
 ```cpp
 struct MyStruct
 {
-    int value{};
+    int value{};  // empty brace initializer sets value to 0
     MyStruct() {} // no warning, MyStruct::value is set via default member initialization
 };
 ```