Skip to content

test: use the corresponding port for built-in-routes test #3708

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 21, 2021

Conversation

snitin315
Copy link
Member

  • This is a bugfix
  • This is a feature
  • This is a code refactor
  • This is a test update
  • This is a docs update
  • This is a metadata update

For Bugs and Features; did you add new tests?

No

Motivation / Use-Case

use the corresponding port for built-in-routes.test.js

Breaking Changes

No

Additional Info

No

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 21, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #3708 (1f324c7) into master (2a711c3) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3708   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.27%   93.27%           
=======================================
  Files          15       15           
  Lines        1324     1324           
  Branches      458      458           
=======================================
  Hits         1235     1235           
  Misses         82       82           
  Partials        7        7           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2a711c3...1f324c7. Read the comment docs.

@snitin315 snitin315 merged commit 46b459a into master Aug 21, 2021
@snitin315 snitin315 deleted the test/routes-port branch August 21, 2021 02:46
@alexander-akait
Copy link
Member

Good catch 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants