Skip to content

docs: add headers option example #3809

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 8, 2021
Merged

Conversation

snitin315
Copy link
Member

  • This is a bugfix
  • This is a feature
  • This is a code refactor
  • This is a test update
  • This is a docs update
  • This is a metadata update

For Bugs and Features; did you add new tests?

Motivation / Use-Case

add headers option example.

Breaking Changes

None

Additional Info

None

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 8, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #3809 (bc0e1e0) into master (0535c41) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3809   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.88%   92.88%           
=======================================
  Files          14       14           
  Lines        1321     1321           
  Branches      463      463           
=======================================
  Hits         1227     1227           
  Misses         87       87           
  Partials        7        7           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 255b2f0...bc0e1e0. Read the comment docs.

@alexander-akait alexander-akait merged commit e77a41b into master Sep 8, 2021
@alexander-akait alexander-akait deleted the docs-headers-example branch September 8, 2021 10:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants