Skip to content

test: add e2e tests for checkHostHeader method #4118

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2021

Conversation

snitin315
Copy link
Member

  • This is a bugfix
  • This is a feature
  • This is a code refactor
  • This is a test update
  • This is a docs update
  • This is a metadata update

For Bugs and Features; did you add new tests?

refactor tests

Motivation / Use-Case

Move checkHostHeader tests to e2e.

Breaking Changes

None

Additional Info

No

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #4118 (1c52a88) into master (d9b490d) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #4118   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.65%   92.65%           
=======================================
  Files          14       14           
  Lines        1484     1484           
  Branches      548      548           
=======================================
  Hits         1375     1375           
  Misses        101      101           
  Partials        8        8           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d9b490d...1c52a88. Read the comment docs.

@alexander-akait alexander-akait merged commit 0ed7d9e into master Dec 18, 2021
@alexander-akait alexander-akait deleted the e2e-api-check-host-header branch December 18, 2021 11:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants