Updated C33010

Acrolinx fixes

Author: MugBergerFries

docs/code-quality/c33010.md

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ This warning is triggered if an enum is both used as an index into an array and
 
 ## Remarks
 
-Code using enumerated types as indexes for arrays will often check for the upper bound in order to ensure the index is not out of range. Because an enum variable is signed by default, it can have a negative value. If it is used as an index into an array of values or an array of function pointers, a negative value can allow arbitrary memory to be read, used, or even executed.
+Code using enumerated types as indexes for arrays will often check for the upper bound in order to ensure the index isn't out of range. Because an enum variable is signed by default, it can have a negative value. A negative array index can allow arbitrary memory to be read, used, or even executed.
 
 Code analysis name: UNCHECKED_LOWER_BOUND_FOR_ENUMINDEX
 
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ void foo(Index idx, PFN(&functions)[5])
 }
 ```
 
-These following code remediates this warning by checking the lower bound as well to ensure `idx` is not negative:
+The following code remediates this warning by checking the lower bound as well to ensure `idx` isn't negative:
 
 ```cpp
 typedef void (*PFN)();