Skip to content

Fix fragile method for passing from ECDSA to ECP restart contexts #184

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

hanno-becker
Copy link

Sideport of Mbed-TLS/mbedtls#2751 to Mbed Crypto.

All modules using restartable ECC operations support passing `NULL`
as the restart context as a means to not use the feature.

The restart contexts for ECDSA and ECP are nested, and when calling
restartable ECP operations from restartable ECDSA operations, the
address of the ECP restart context to use is calculated by adding
the to the address of the ECDSA restart context the offset the of
the ECP restart context.

If the ECP restart context happens to not reside at offset `0`, this
leads to a non-`NULL` pointer being passed to restartable ECP
operations from restartable ECDSA-operations; those ECP operations
will hence assume that the pointer points to a valid ECP restart
address and likely run into a segmentation fault when trying to
dereference the non-NULL but close-to-NULL address.

The problem doesn't arise currently because luckily the ECP restart
context has offset 0 within the ECDSA restart context, but we should
not rely on it.

This commit fixes the passage from restartable ECDSA to restartable ECP
operations by propagating NULL as the restart context pointer.

Apart from being fragile, the previous version could also lead to
NULL pointer dereference failures in ASanDbg builds which dereferenced
the ECDSA restart context even though it's not needed to calculate the
address of the offset'ed ECP restart context.
@hanno-becker hanno-becker added bug Something isn't working needs: review The pull request is ready for review. This generally means that it has no known issues. labels Jul 19, 2019
@gilles-peskine-arm gilles-peskine-arm removed the needs: review The pull request is ready for review. This generally means that it has no known issues. label Aug 14, 2019
@gilles-peskine-arm gilles-peskine-arm merged commit 0ed1df6 into ARMmbed:development Aug 14, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants