Skip to content

workflow: remove rollup #1232

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 20, 2020
Merged

Conversation

0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

@0xc0170 0xc0170 commented Feb 11, 2020

Not used anymore, label will be removed as well.

cc @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers

Not used anymore, label will be removed as well.

- Rollup pull requests drastically lower the time to test many pull requests at once. Instead of putting many pull requests through CI, only one goes through testing. This lowers the load on the CI infrastructure and helps close pull requests sooner.

- The second, more subtle problem that rollup pull requests solve is the case in which two pull requests pass testing on their own, but as soon as they join together, the way they interact with each other causes tests to fail. See more [about semantic conflicts](https://bors.tech/essay/2017/02/02/pitch).
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this could be the only use case we can have in the future. However for this simple use case, we can keep the label and describe it as its on 260, not the entire section

@cmonr
Copy link
Contributor

cmonr commented Feb 11, 2020

😢

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor Author

0xc0170 commented Feb 11, 2020

@cmonr We shall not need this anymore :)

@AnotherButler
Copy link
Contributor

Does this apply to 5.15, too?

@AnotherButler AnotherButler merged commit c17a38c into ARMmbed:development Feb 20, 2020
@0xc0170 0xc0170 deleted the fix_remove_rollup branch February 21, 2020 07:16
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor Author

0xc0170 commented Feb 21, 2020

Does this apply to 5.15, too?

It's process thing so yes, it would. Any PR on Github

AnotherButler pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2020
Apply changes from PR #1232 to v5.15.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants