Add and updated cypress kits in the platform database

[miteshdedhia7]

Description

Add Cypress PSoC6 kits to the platform database. The Board IDs are as assigned by @maclobdell
Added and updated the following kits,
CYW9P62S1_43012EVB_01: 1903 (Updated)
CY8CKIT_062S2_4343W: 1905 (Updated)
CY8CPROTO_064_SB: 1907 (Added)
CYW9P62S1_43438EVB_01: 1908 (Added)
CY8CKIT_062S2_43012: 190B (Added)
CY8CPROTO-062S3-4343W: 190E (Added)

The corresponding change to mbed-os targets is ongoing.

Pull request type

[ ] Fix
[ ] Refactor
[x ] Target update
[ ] Functionality change
[ ] Docs update
[ ] Test update
[ ] Breaking change

Reviewers

@maclobdell @vmedcy

[maclobdell]

@cy-midd - Can you please confirm the correct value for the board with ID '190E'

I received notification from Vita that, "CY8CPROTO-062S2-4343W should be renamed to CY8CPROTO-062S3-43012." Please confirm if that is still correct. You may need to update your PR.

@ARMmbed/mbed-os-tools - Please review and approve once the above entry is confirmed.

[miteshdedhia7]

@maclobdell I double checked the kits and I can confirm the for 190E the kit is CY8CPROTO-062S3-4343W. The current data in the pull request is correct. Apologies for the confusion, I believe the internal ARM database also have to be updated since the initial value that was submitted was CY8CPROTO-062S3-43012 which was incorrect.

[maclobdell]

@ARMmbed/mbed-os-tools - this should be ready to go. Please review.

[maclobdell]

@madchutney - are you planning to merge this request and do a release?

[madchutney]

@maclobdell This should go out with the next OS patch release.

[maclobdell]

@madchutney - thanks a lot. Just to clarify, you plan to merge this PR, then make a release, which will be added to the requirements.txt in mbed-os for release 5.13.3? this will be ready in time for code freeze this week, right?

[madchutney]

@maclobdell I've run into a problem, the online database doesn't match the values being submitted here. Can you update the database please?

[maclobdell]

@madchutney - sorry about that, I normally do not bother updating the database to add the target names for pre-released boards. I have done that now.

However, I just discovered two problems. @cy-midd - Can you help resolve these issues?

First - this value in this PR is using dashes (-) instead of underscores. We recommend underscores (_).

'190E': u'CY8CPROTO-062S3-4343W',

Second - several target names are 21 characters long. However, our system will only accept target names of 20 character or less.

Can you reduce the number of characters by 1 or more?

u'1903': u'CYW9P62S1_43012EVB_01',
u'1908': u'CYW9P62S1_43438EVB_01',
u'1909': u'CY8CPROTO_062S2_43012',
u'190E': u'CY8CPROTO-062S3-4343W',

Keep in mind that these values will need to match the target name in mbed-os/targets/targets.json when a pull request is made to add these targets to Mbed OS.

[mark-edgeworth]

Unable to pass the last couple of tests because of issues with posting to Coveralls. I'll keep trying, but this is out of our control at the moment.

[miteshdedhia7]

@maclobdell I updated the "-" to "_" that was an error. As for the target name length, we are trying to get feedback internally from our marketing team to find the best way to resolve this issue.