Skip to content

Define program_cycle_s for LPC55S69 & CY8CKIT_062_WIFI_BT #10206

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 27, 2019
Merged

Define program_cycle_s for LPC55S69 & CY8CKIT_062_WIFI_BT #10206

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 27, 2019

Conversation

orenc17
Copy link
Contributor

@orenc17 orenc17 commented Mar 24, 2019

Description

For smoother test running

Pull request type

[X] Fix
[ ] Refactor
[ ] Target update
[ ] Functionality change
[ ] Docs update
[ ] Test update
[ ] Breaking change

Reviewers

@mmahadevan108

Release Notes

@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@orenc17, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested a review from a team March 24, 2019 16:00
@orenc17 orenc17 mentioned this pull request Mar 24, 2019
@orenc17 orenc17 changed the title Define program_cycle_s for NXP LPC55S69 Define program_cycle_s for LPC55S69 & CY8CKIT_062_WIFI_BT Mar 25, 2019
@orenc17
Copy link
Contributor Author

orenc17 commented Mar 25, 2019

@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers this works in our private CI

https://mbed-os.mbedcloudtesting.com/blue/organizations/jenkins/PSA-SPM-tests/detail/PSA-SPM-tests/20/pipeline

please run CI and tag for 5.12.1

@cmonr
Copy link
Contributor

cmonr commented Mar 26, 2019

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Mar 26, 2019

Test run: SUCCESS

Summary: 13 of 13 test jobs passed
Build number : 1
Build artifacts

cmonr pushed a commit to cmonr/mbed-os that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2019
Define program_cycle_s for LPC55S69 & CY8CKIT_062_WIFI_BT
@cmonr cmonr merged commit 61b0d8e into ARMmbed:master Mar 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants