-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
PSA Crypto Service - multipart operation memory fixes #10232
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
0xc0170
merged 15 commits into
ARMmbed:master
from
itayzafrir:crypto-service-multipart-operation-abort-fix
Apr 11, 2019
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1b26e0d
Fix crypto service abort functionality - cipher
da999c6
Fix crypto service abort functionality - hash
545e669
Fix crypto service abort functionality - mac
8044f6d
Fix crypto service abort functionality - generators
7b35e76
Do not allocate zero sized buffers - mac
979ca1e
Do not allocate zero sized buffers - hash
18feb26
Do not allocate zero sized buffers - asymmetric
19952d9
Do not allocate zero sized buffers - aead
f3294ef
Do not allocate zero sized buffers - cipher
19b8381
Do not allocate zero sized buffers - keys
abd9c66
Do not allocate zero sized buffers - entropy
749b1e3
Do not allocate zero sized buffers - rng
b26890e
Do not allocate zero sized buffers - generators
a446ee6
Rename internal function destroy_hash_clone to clear_hash_clone
2b81588
Add message context cleanup helper function
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ipc_call is a wrapper by itself.
i suggest for the same idea of code being clear and refactoring.
to put the
if (status != PSA_SUCCESS) {
ipc_close(&operation->handle);
inside ipc_call in case of failure.
with only one important note, if and only if we always want to close connections on call failure
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not always true, e.g. generators functions like
psa_get_generator_capacity
etc. don't close in case of error, so leaving it as is.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why they don't close?
maybe we want to consider having a flag passed whether to close or not.
and still hide the close inside? there are too many of the same "close"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think having another flag makes much of a difference regarding code size or readability, if you think it's important I'll make another change.