Skip to content

FUTURE_SEQUANA_PSA fix PSA Protected storage #10368

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2019
Merged

FUTURE_SEQUANA_PSA fix PSA Protected storage #10368

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2019

Conversation

orenc17
Copy link
Contributor

@orenc17 orenc17 commented Apr 10, 2019

Description

Configure TDBStore explicitly for FUTURE_SEQUANA_PSA to support PSA Protected storage

Pull request type

[X] Fix
[ ] Refactor
[ ] Target update
[ ] Functionality change
[ ] Docs update
[ ] Test update
[ ] Breaking change

Reviewers

@lrusinowicz

Release Notes

@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@orenc17, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-storage @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

Copy link
Contributor

@yossi2le yossi2le left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Apr 11, 2019

CI started

Copy link
Contributor

@lrusinowicz lrusinowicz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Apr 11, 2019

Test run: SUCCESS

Summary: 11 of 11 test jobs passed
Build number : 1
Build artifacts

@0xc0170 0xc0170 merged commit f56808f into ARMmbed:master Apr 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants