Skip to content

MCU_STM32G031xx : decrease boot-stack-size #13587

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2020
Merged

MCU_STM32G031xx : decrease boot-stack-size #13587

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2020

Conversation

jeromecoutant
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary of changes

This fixes #13498

As a small RAM target, default boot-stack-size is decreased for baremetal full support.

Impact of changes

Migration actions required

Documentation

Pull request type 

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results 

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[x] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers

@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Sep 10, 2020
@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested a review from a team September 10, 2020 12:30
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@jeromecoutant, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Sep 10, 2020

As a small RAM target, default boot-stack-size is decreased for baremetal full support.

can you add this to the commit itself?

@jeromecoutant
MCU_STM32G031xx : decrease boot-stack-size
2441e15 
As a small RAM target,
default boot-stack-size is decreased
for baremetal full support
@jeromecoutant
Copy link
Collaborator Author

can you add this to the commit itself?

done

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Sep 10, 2020

CI started

@mergify mergify bot added needs: CI and removed needs: review labels Sep 10, 2020
@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Sep 10, 2020

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_dynamic-memory-usage ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cloud-client-pytest ✔️

@0xc0170 0xc0170 merged commit f7d5dfb into ARMmbed:master Sep 10, 2020
@mergify mergify bot removed the ready for merge label Sep 10, 2020
@jeromecoutant jeromecoutant deleted the PR_G031 branch September 10, 2020 14:30
@mbedmain mbedmain added release-version: 6.3.0 Release-pending and removed release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch Release-pending labels Sep 14, 2020
@jeromecoutant jeromecoutant mentioned this pull request Sep 17, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@0xc0170 0xc0170 0xc0170 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
release-version: 6.3.0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

NUCLEO_G031K8 Failed to build all greentea images in bare-metal profile
5 participants
@jeromecoutant @ciarmcom @0xc0170 @mbed-ci @mbedmain