Skip to content

Add missing blockdevice mbed_lib.json #13878

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2020

Conversation

evedon
Copy link
Contributor

@evedon evedon commented Nov 6, 2020

Summary of changes

The block device library does not have a mbed_lib.json file. This means that the blockdevice source files are implicitly built in bare metal profile. This PR adds the missing library file and explicitly adds blockdevice to the bare metal profile.

Impact of changes

None

Migration actions required

None

Documentation

None


Pull request type

[X] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[X] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers


@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Nov 6, 2020
@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested review from a team November 6, 2020 16:00
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

ciarmcom commented Nov 6, 2020

@evedon, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-core @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

Copy link
Contributor

@LDong-Arm LDong-Arm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@LDong-Arm
Copy link
Contributor

My bad, I removed the inline comment - blockdevice is in bare metal by default now. Looks good to me.

Copy link
Contributor

@0xc0170 0xc0170 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll create a story to review this with CMake - if there is a chance to clean this up to provide the true bare metal not: + storage+ usb + other components.

@mergify mergify bot added needs: CI and removed needs: review labels Nov 11, 2020
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Nov 11, 2020

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Nov 11, 2020

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_dynamic-memory-usage ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cloud-client-pytest ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️

@0xc0170 0xc0170 merged commit 65097e1 into ARMmbed:master Nov 12, 2020
@mergify mergify bot removed the ready for merge label Nov 12, 2020
@mbedmain mbedmain added release-version: 6.5.0 Release-pending and removed release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch Release-pending labels Nov 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants