Skip to content

Dragonfly Nano(MTQN): power on/off so soft_power_on() fix #13935

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2020

Conversation

felser
Copy link
Contributor

@felser felser commented Nov 20, 2020

…a reset

Summary of changes

Add reset functionality to soft_power_on() function

Previously soft_power_on() would only power on the radio. Now it will reset and power it on.

Impact of changes

Migration actions required

Documentation


Pull request type

[X] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[X] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Called soft_power_on() and verified that it resets and powers on the radio.

Reviewers


@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Nov 20, 2020
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@felser, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/team-st-mcd @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested review from a team November 20, 2020 00:30
@0xc0170 0xc0170 changed the title Update Dragonfly Nano(MTQN) power on/off so soft_power_on() performs … Dragonfly Nano(MTQN): power on/off so soft_power_on() fix Nov 20, 2020
@mergify mergify bot added needs: CI and removed needs: review labels Nov 20, 2020
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Nov 23, 2020

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Nov 23, 2020

Jenkins CI Test : ❌ FAILED

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_dynamic-memory-usage ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cloud-client-pytest

@mergify mergify bot added needs: work and removed needs: CI labels Nov 23, 2020
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Nov 23, 2020

Test restarted

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Nov 23, 2020

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 2 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_dynamic-memory-usage ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cloud-client-pytest ✔️

@0xc0170 0xc0170 merged commit 6d89500 into ARMmbed:master Nov 24, 2020
@mergify mergify bot removed the ready for merge label Nov 24, 2020
@mbedmain mbedmain added release-version: 6.6.0 Release-pending and removed release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch Release-pending labels Dec 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants