Skip to content

Silabs: Remove EFR32_1 rail files #13961

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2020
Merged

Silabs: Remove EFR32_1 rail files #13961

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2020

Conversation

hugueskamba
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary of changes

Mbed OS 6 does not support Silicon Labs EFR32_1 rail

Impact of changes

Migration actions required

Documentation

Pull request type 

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results 

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[x] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers

@hugueskamba
Silabs: Remove EFR32_1 rail files
3f182c5 
Mbed OS 6 does not support Silicon Labs EFR32_1 rail
@hugueskamba hugueskamba requested review from MarceloSalazar, 0xc0170 and a team November 25, 2020 13:19
@mergify mergify bot added the needs: CI label Nov 25, 2020
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Nov 26, 2020

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Nov 26, 2020

Jenkins CI Test : ❌ FAILED

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_dynamic-memory-usage ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cloud-client-pytest ❌

@mergify mergify bot added needs: work and removed needs: CI labels Nov 26, 2020
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Dec 1, 2020

CI restarted

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Dec 1, 2020

Jenkins CI Test : ❌ FAILED

Build Number: 2 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_dynamic-memory-usage ❌
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cloud-client-pytest ✔️

@0xc0170 0xc0170 added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Dec 1, 2020
@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Dec 1, 2020

Jenkins CI Test : ❌ FAILED

Build Number: 3 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cloud-client-pytest ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-test ❌
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ❌

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Dec 2, 2020

CI restarted

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Dec 2, 2020

Jenkins CI Test : ❌ FAILED

Build Number: 4 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cloud-client-pytest ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ❌

@mergify mergify bot added needs: work and removed needs: CI labels Dec 2, 2020
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Dec 9, 2020

CI restarted

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Dec 9, 2020

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 5 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cloud-client-pytest ✔️

@0xc0170 0xc0170 merged commit c62b8e5 into ARMmbed:master Dec 9, 2020
@mergify mergify bot removed the ready for merge label Dec 9, 2020
@hugueskamba hugueskamba deleted the hk_remove_silabs_rail_EFR32_1 branch December 11, 2020 09:49
@mbedmain mbedmain added Release-pending and removed release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch Release-pending labels Dec 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@0xc0170 0xc0170 0xc0170 approved these changes

@MarceloSalazar MarceloSalazar Awaiting requested review from MarceloSalazar

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
release-version: 6.6.0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@hugueskamba @0xc0170 @mbed-ci @mbedmain