Skip to content

WIO_BG96: fix macro exclusion - use cellular #14424

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2021

Conversation

0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

@0xc0170 0xc0170 commented Mar 12, 2021

This depends on cellular drivers not netsockets (it works because both are present in
the system, not true when you use CMake).

Summary of changes

I've noticed the on board modem was using netsockets present and not cellular while reviewing similar driver.

Impact of changes

Migration actions required

Documentation


Pull request type

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[x] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers


This depends on cellular drivers not netsockets (it works because both are present in
the system, not true when you use CMake).
@0xc0170 0xc0170 requested a review from a team March 12, 2021 15:30
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor Author

0xc0170 commented Mar 12, 2021

@ARMmbed/team-st-mcd did I miss something why nsapi was used instead of cellular?

@jeromecoutant
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry, I don't know TARGET_WIO_BG96

@MarceloSalazar

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor Author

0xc0170 commented Mar 12, 2021

I see. I checked git blame. This was maintained mainly but cellular team.

@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Mar 12, 2021
@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested a review from a team March 12, 2021 16:00
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@0xc0170, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@MarceloSalazar
Copy link

This target is own by @ARMmbed/team-seeed

@0xc0170 0xc0170 requested review from a team and removed request for a team March 16, 2021 11:43
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor Author

0xc0170 commented Apr 7, 2021

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Apr 7, 2021

Jenkins CI Test : ❌ FAILED

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor Author

0xc0170 commented Apr 8, 2021

CI restarted

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Apr 8, 2021

Jenkins CI Test : ❌ FAILED

Build Number: 2 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-GCC_ARM
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-ARM
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Apr 12, 2021

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 3 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-test ✔️

@0xc0170 0xc0170 merged commit 38796d0 into ARMmbed:master Apr 12, 2021
@mergify mergify bot removed the ready for merge label Apr 12, 2021
@mbedmain mbedmain removed the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Apr 26, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants