Skip to content

Fix missing as_entry method in KVStoreSecurityDb #14684

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2021

Conversation

AGlass0fMilk
Copy link
Member

Summary of changes

This commit introduces changes to fix a missing method, as_entry, and traces that were not updated properly to work with this new method.

Prior to this fix, it was not possible to use KVStoreSecurityDb as the build would fail since the as_entry method was not declared in the class header file.

This bug was introduced with commit 957486e in PR #14198

Impact of changes

Migration actions required

Documentation

None


Pull request type

[X] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[X] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers

@pan- @paul-szczepanek-arm @noonfom @ladislas

Perhaps we should add a test for this build configuration?


This commit introduces changes to fix a missing method, `as_entry`, and traces that were not updated properly to work with this new method.

Prior to this fix, it was not possible to use KVStoreSecurityDb as the build would fail since the `as_entry` method was not declared in the class header file.

This bug was introduced with commit 957486e in PR ARMmbed#14198
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@AGlass0fMilk, thank you for your changes.
@pan- @paul-szczepanek-arm @noonfom @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@mergify mergify bot added needs: CI and removed needs: review labels May 20, 2021
Copy link

@ghost ghost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR fixes BLE_SecurityAndPrivacy CLI 1 builds, so party addresses #14660.

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented May 20, 2021

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented May 20, 2021

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️

@adbridge adbridge merged commit 77927d0 into ARMmbed:master May 24, 2021
@mbedmain mbedmain added release-version: 6.12.0 Release-pending and removed release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch Release-pending labels Jun 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants