add hard fault handlers for MultiTech mDot and Dragonfly platforms #1615
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Looks good to me. We might consider providing default "fault" handlers (they could dump some fundamental information for a user), that can be overwritten like you did for these 2 targets. |
0xc0170
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2016
add hard fault handlers for MultiTech mDot and Dragonfly platforms
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since MTS products can be deployed and are expected to stay up and running indefinitely, reset the device if a fault is encountered instead of sitting in a while(1); loop.