Skip to content

[STM32F4-Discovery (STM32F407VG)] initial port #227

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2014
Merged

[STM32F4-Discovery (STM32F407VG)] initial port #227

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2014

Conversation

dinau
Copy link
Contributor

@dinau dinau commented Mar 24, 2014

Hello,

I've ported mbed-sdk to STM32F4-Discovery(STM32F407VG) board.
This port is basically derived from NUCLEO_401RE port
and ported only with GCC_ARM toolchain at the momemt.

The target name is 'DISCO_F407VG'.

The statement at this moment is as follows,
I've checked working well,
(1) Simple 'ticker' program 'MBED_11: Ticker with printf() out to UART' is ok.
PA2: UART TX
PA3: UART RX
(3) MBED_5: PWM
PWM port is PB_3
Period 20msec, duty 50% is ok.
(4) wait_us() function, 100usec is ok.

NUCLEO_401RE(STM32F401RE) and STM32F4-Discovery(STM32F407VG) have
very similar peripheral architecture,
so probably some other peripheral test will be pass.

Build method:
(1) Build mbed library
python workspace_tools/build.py -m DISCO_F407VG -t GCC_ARM
(2) Generate test project (i.e.)
python workspace_tools/project.py -m DISCO_F407VG -i gcc_arm -p 39
(3) Build test project
Unzip
build/export/MBED_11_gcc_arm_DISCO_F407VG.zip
and execute command line 'make'.

Would you merge this implimentation ?

dinau

emilmont added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2014
[STM32F4-Discovery (STM32F407VG)] initial port
@emilmont emilmont merged commit 47b9612 into ARMmbed:master Mar 24, 2014
bridadan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2016
Updating mbed-client-classic git pointer.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants