Skip to content

Updating Nanostack Binary for ARMCC #2329

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 2, 2016
Merged

Conversation

hasnainvirk
Copy link
Contributor

  • No code change.
  • Binary built and fetched from Jenkins.
  • Tested with mbed-os-example-mesh-minimal

@SeppoTakalo , @c1728p9 , @sg-

* No code change.
* Binary built and fetched from Jenkins.
* Tested with mbed-os-example-mesh-minimal
@c1728p9
Copy link
Contributor

c1728p9 commented Aug 1, 2016

/morph test

@c1728p9
Copy link
Contributor

c1728p9 commented Aug 1, 2016

@mbed-bot: TEST

HOST_OSES=windows
BUILD_TOOLCHAINS=GCC_ARM,ARM,IAR
TARGETS=K64F,NRF51_DK,NRF51_MICROBIT,NUCLEO_F411RE

@c1728p9
Copy link
Contributor

c1728p9 commented Aug 1, 2016

I verified that I can connect to both thread and 6lowpan with mbed-os-example-mesh-minimal built with ARM and this updated binary. This patch should ready for merging if testing passes.

CC: @sg-, @0xc0170

@mbed-bot
Copy link

mbed-bot commented Aug 1, 2016

[Build 754]
SUCCESS: Building succeeded and tests were run! Be sure to check the test results

@mbed-bot
Copy link

mbed-bot commented Aug 1, 2016

Result: FAILURE

Your command has finished executing! Here's what you wrote!

/morph test

Output

mbed Build Number: 574

Test failed!

@bridadan
Copy link
Contributor

bridadan commented Aug 1, 2016

The K64F for the GCC run was in a bad state, I will go ahead and rerun this.

/morph test

@mbed-bot
Copy link

mbed-bot commented Aug 2, 2016

Result: SUCCESS

Your command has finished executing! Here's what you wrote!

/morph test

Output

mbed Build Number: 577

All builds and test passed!

@bogdanm bogdanm merged commit a7a9325 into ARMmbed:master Aug 2, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants