Skip to content

Remove IPv6 link time dependency on an RF phy #2551

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2016
Merged

Conversation

c1728p9
Copy link
Contributor

@c1728p9 c1728p9 commented Aug 26, 2016

Create a Nanostack rf phy class to wrap various rf physical interfaces.
Allow this phy to be set at runtime rather than compile time.

@c1728p9
Copy link
Contributor Author

c1728p9 commented Aug 26, 2016

/morph test

@c1728p9
Copy link
Contributor Author

c1728p9 commented Aug 26, 2016

@mbed-bot: TEST

HOST_OSES=ALL
BUILD_TOOLCHAINS=GCC_ARM
TARGETS=K64F,NRF51_DK,NRF51_MICROBIT,NUCLEO_F411RE

@mbed-bot
Copy link

Result: SUCCESS

Your command has finished executing! Here's what you wrote!

/morph test

Output

mbed Build Number: 719

All builds and test passed!

@mbed-bot
Copy link

[Build 842]
SUCCESS: Building succeeded and tests were run! Be sure to check the test results

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Aug 26, 2016

Who should review this changeset? Please mention them here

@jupe
Copy link
Contributor

jupe commented Aug 26, 2016

@kjbracey-arm @SeppoTakalo @juhhei01: you guys probably know something about this..

@kjbracey
Copy link
Contributor

The MeshInterface change seems good to me.

Do we think we can live without the MAC bit in the random? Is the mbed TLS support hookup definitely working?

@SeppoTakalo
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@c1728p9
Copy link
Contributor Author

c1728p9 commented Aug 29, 2016

@kjbracey-arm TLS support should be working, as client applications without an entropy source do not work. Turning on null entropy fixes this. Notes could be added to the example to turn on null entropy if the platform does not support it. Alternatively, an entropy source C++ API could be defined and the RF drivers could support it. This would take a bit longer to implement though.

Create a Nanostack rf phy class to wrap various rf physical interfaces.
Allow this phy to be set at runtime rather than compile time.
@sg-
Copy link
Contributor

sg- commented Sep 8, 2016

@c1728p9 @kjbracey-arm @SeppoTakalo

Anything blocking this from being merged?

@sg-
Copy link
Contributor

sg- commented Sep 16, 2016

Will plan be part of mbed OS 5.2, not back ported to mbed OS 5.1

@sg- sg- deleted the runtime_configuration branch October 19, 2016 12:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants