Skip to content

u-blox rearrange ODIN target #4089

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

andreaslarssonublox
Copy link

Description

This PR pushes the ODIN-W2 target further down in the STM32F439xI target hierarchy to avoid duplicate code.

Status

This PR shall be merged before:
#4081

Migrations

NO

Related PRs

#4081

Todos

None

Deploy notes

Steps to test or reproduce

Test results

ublox_rearrange_odin_target_log_arm.txt
ublox_rearrange_odin_target_log_gcc.txt
ublox_rearrange_odin_target_log_iar_.txt

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Mar 31, 2017

/morph test

@mbed-bot
Copy link

Result: FAILURE

Your command has finished executing! Here's what you wrote!

/morph test

Output

mbed Build Number: 1805

Test failed!

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Mar 31, 2017

Sporadic failure, restarting

/morph test

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Mar 31, 2017

retest uvisor

@mbed-bot
Copy link

Result: FAILURE

Your command has finished executing! Here's what you wrote!

/morph test

Output

mbed Build Number: 1806

Test failed!

@bridadan
Copy link
Contributor

The failure was caused by a board's interface getting into a bad state, restarting the tests now.

/morph test

@mbed-bot
Copy link

Result: SUCCESS

Your command has finished executing! Here's what you wrote!

/morph test

Output

mbed Build Number: 1808

All builds and test passed!

@sg-
Copy link
Contributor

sg- commented Apr 6, 2017

@andreaslarssonublox sorry but went though 'ready for merge' in oldest to newest and 4081 got merged before this. Kinda glad this happened because this is a restructure - can it hold off and be applied against master later in May once the workshop branch is merged? I fear there will be a divergence if we take this here any try to apply patches for this target between now and then

@andreaslarssonublox
Copy link
Author

andreaslarssonublox commented Apr 7, 2017

Yes, we can wait! Also think it's better if we wait until all features(related to the workshop) for STM32F439xI have been done by ST and merged to master.

@theotherjimmy
Copy link
Contributor

bump @andreaslarssonublox Could you fix the merge conflicts?

@andreaslarssonublox
Copy link
Author

@theotherjimmy I have merged in the latest now and resolved the conflicts.

@theotherjimmy
Copy link
Contributor

/morph test

@mbed-bot
Copy link

mbed-bot commented May 3, 2017

Result: SUCCESS

Your command has finished executing! Here's what you wrote!

/morph test

Output

mbed Build Number: 133

All builds and test passed!

@theotherjimmy
Copy link
Contributor

Nice!

@theotherjimmy
Copy link
Contributor

@andreaslarssonublox you mentioned that this should come in before #4081, but it's already merged. Is this going to be a problem?

@andreaslarssonublox
Copy link
Author

@theotherjimmy It was the other way around. So it's the correct order. Sorry if the description was confusing.

@theotherjimmy
Copy link
Contributor

That's a-okay. I'm just happy that things worked out correctly

@sg- sg- merged commit 217a5ed into ARMmbed:mbed-os-workshop-17q2 May 18, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants