Extend nRF51 AnalogIn voltage range to 3.6 V #5200
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Previous the voltage range was set to 1.2 from SoC internal reference source. This caused problem with testing. It is unexpected that range is much shorter than vdd as well. The voltage range was extended using SoC build in analog prescaler (set to 1/3).
0xc0170
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2017
|
/morph test |
Result: ABORTEDYour command has finished executing! Here's what you wrote!
|
|
/morph test |
Result: SUCCESSYour command has finished executing! Here's what you wrote!
OutputAll builds and test passed! |
theotherjimmy
added
release-version: 5.6.0-rc2
release-version: 5.7.0-rc1
and removed
ready for merge
release-version: 5.6.0-rc2
labels
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previous the voltage range was ste to 1.2 v from SoC internal reference source.
This caused problem with testing. It is unexpected that range is much
shorter than vdd as well.
Fix for analog part of ct-test-shield test issue #5133