Skip to content

Nanostack binary to mbed os 5.7 #5481

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

artokin
Copy link
Contributor

@artokin artokin commented Nov 13, 2017

Description

Nanostack binary release for mbed-os-5.7.

Binaries are compiled using toolchains:

  • ARM Compiler 5.06 update 6 (build 750)
  • arm-none-eabi-gcc 6.3.1 20170215
  • IAR ANSI C/C++ Compiler V8.20.1.14183/W32 for ARM

Following libraries updated :

  • features/nanostack/FEATURE_NANOSTACK/coap-service
  • features/FEATURE_COMMON_PAL/mbed-trace
  • features/FEATURE_COMMON_PAL/sal-stack-nanostack-eventloop
  • features/FEATURE_COMMON_PAL/nanostack-libservice
  • features/FEATURE_COMMON_PAL/mbed-client-randlib

Status

READY

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Nov 13, 2017

Binaries are compiled using toolchains:

ARM Compiler 5.06 update 6 (build 750)
arm-none-eabi-gcc 6.3.1 20170215
IAR ANSI C/C++ Compiler V8.20.1.14183/W32 for ARM

@studavekar

Copy link
Contributor

@SeppoTakalo SeppoTakalo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+2

@artokin
Copy link
Contributor Author

artokin commented Nov 16, 2017

This PR is replaced by #5511 and therefore this PR will be closed.

@artokin artokin closed this Nov 16, 2017
@artokin artokin force-pushed the nanostack-mbed-os-5.7 branch from 0a1105a to 3bedff3 Compare November 16, 2017 18:31
@sg- sg- removed the needs: review label Nov 16, 2017
@artokin artokin deleted the nanostack-mbed-os-5.7 branch November 16, 2017 18:34
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Nov 17, 2017

@artokin Should also two PR be closed that have binaries for IAR 8 and ARMC6 ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants