-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
Work around Arm Compiler 6 stdvector perfomance cliff #5993
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Size difffat-fs example
|
478c4a6
to
2fd7cfc
Compare
Note: The commits are backwards in github. More Size diff
|
@theotherjimmy Can you clarify (provide more details in the commit message what is this fixing and how) ? The sizediff in #5993 (comment) are the same. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍
Can we also get numbers for the same test using ARMC5?
The target branch does not support ARMC5. I'd have to retarget, or open a different PR. |
@theotherjimmy That's better 👍 . Hopefully once the version of libc++ shipped with ARMCC will be released, we will be able to use the configuration macro |
/morph build |
Build : FAILUREBuild number : 1107 |
The error is comming from ble; I've proposed a fix in #6058 . |
Aaand it's rebase time! |
/morph build |
Build : FAILUREBuild number : 1173 |
@theotherjimmy If you can rebase the destination branch to include the fix ? |
@0xc0170 I'll rebase now |
b858986
to
d3c2bdd
Compare
2fd7cfc
to
3500c5a
Compare
/morph build |
Rebase done for both |
Build : FAILUREBuild number : 1183 |
Logs look like they were suddenly cut off. Rebuilding. /morph build |
Build : FAILUREBuild number : 1187 |
This should go to master |
@theotherjimmy Like so? |
Destination branch updated, seems like some changes should not be here, please review and rebase |
3500c5a
to
0f15633
Compare
/morph build |
Build : SUCCESSBuild number : 1306 Triggering tests/morph test |
Exporter Build : SUCCESSBuild number : 966 |
Test : SUCCESSBuild number : 1090 |
Hi @pan- and @theotherjimmy , I'm wondering if the |
@michalpasztamobica You may want to open a new issue to discuss the removal of this workaround. Further, Note that I no longer work on Mbed OS, and I would appreciate being left out of these discussions. @ARMmbed/mbed-os-tools Has taken over my role. |
@sg-