Skip to content

Revert "Removing feature names from the "allowed feature" config list." #9212

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cmonr
Copy link
Contributor

@cmonr cmonr commented Dec 28, 2018

Reverts #7799

Copy link
Contributor

@0xc0170 0xc0170 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM otherwise

@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
],
"target_overrides": {
"*": {
"target.features_add": ["LWIP", "COMMON_PAL"],
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This one could be still in, not reverting?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bridadan Was this one that was missed from the original PR?

@theotherjimmy
Copy link
Contributor

@cmonr Could you explain why we need this?

@bridadan
Copy link
Contributor

bridadan commented Jan 2, 2019

Ah according to @theotherjimmy we don't do the whitelist check in the online compiler, so we don't need to revert this after all?

@theotherjimmy This was made in response to @screamerbg's comment here: #7799 (comment)

@theotherjimmy
Copy link
Contributor

yeah... 5cf16f6#diff-0f1a973b12e465163c3fe8f2d1f933c9L1154

@cmonr
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmonr commented Jan 3, 2019

Closing since this appears to not be needed.

@cmonr cmonr closed this Jan 3, 2019
@0xc0170 0xc0170 deleted the revert-7799-remove_allowed_features branch February 21, 2019 08:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants