Skip to content

PSA: Remove unused type which was conflicting wiith errno.h #9976

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2019
Merged

PSA: Remove unused type which was conflicting wiith errno.h #9976

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2019

Conversation

orenc17
Copy link
Contributor

@orenc17 orenc17 commented Mar 7, 2019

Description

error_t was defined in MBED_SPM PSA implementation and was conflicting with error_t defined by the toolchains

as it is not being used in the PSA code at all, and not defined in PSA-FF spec we remove it.
The issue was found when compiling psoc6 with pelion-client

Pull request type

[X] Fix
[ ] Refactor
[ ] Target update
[ ] Functionality change
[ ] Docs update
[ ] Test update
[ ] Breaking change

Reviewers

@ARMmbed/mbed-os-psa @TaniaMirzin

Release Notes

@NirSonnenschein
Copy link
Contributor

new tiny PR needed for cypress issue

Copy link
Contributor

@alzix alzix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@0xc0170 0xc0170 requested a review from a user March 7, 2019 12:30
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Mar 7, 2019

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Mar 7, 2019

Test run: SUCCESS

Summary: 13 of 13 test jobs passed
Build number : 1
Build artifacts

@ghost ghost added the PM_ACCEPTED label Mar 7, 2019
Copy link

@ghost ghost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Meets criteria, PSA related. Approved.

@cmonr cmonr merged commit a00de86 into ARMmbed:master Mar 7, 2019
@orenc17 orenc17 deleted the remove_error_t branch March 7, 2019 14:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants