Skip to content

Implement Add/Remove Cmdlets for VMSS diagnostics extension, add rela… #2899

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 22, 2016

Conversation

zhencui
Copy link
Contributor

@zhencui zhencui commented Sep 6, 2016

Comments


This checklist is used to make sure that common issues in a pull request are covered by the creator. You can find a more complete discussion of PowerShell cmdlet best practices here.

Below in Overall Changes, check off the boxes that apply to your PR. For the categories that you did not check off, you can remove them from this body. Within each of the categories that you did select, make sure that you can check off all of the boxes.

For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, click here.

Overall Changes

General

  • Title of the PR is clear and informative
  • There are a small number of commits that each have an informative message
  • If it applies, references the bug/issue that the PR fixes
  • All files have the Microsoft copyright header
  • Cmdlets refer to management libraries through nuget references - no dlls are checked in
  • The PR does not introduce breaking changes (unless a major version change occurs in the assembly and module)

Tests

  • PR includes test coverage for the included changes
  • Tests must use xunit, and should either use Moq to mock management client calls, or use the scenario test framework
  • PowerShell scripts used in tests must not use hard-coded values for location
  • PowerShell scripts used in tests should do any necessary setup as part of the test or suite setup, and should not use hard-coded values for existing resources
  • Tests should not use App.config files for settings
  • Tests should use the built-in PowerShell functions for generating random names when unique names are necessary - this will store names in the test recording
  • Tests should use Start-Sleep to pause rather than Thread.Sleep

Cmdlet Signature

  • Cmdlet name uses an approved PowerShell verb - use the enums for VerbsCommon, VerbsCommunication, VerbsLifecycle, VerbsOther whenever possible
  • Cmdlet noun name uses the AzureRm prefix for management cmdlets, and the Azure prefix for data plane cmdlets
  • Cmdlet specifies the OutputType attribute if any output is produced; if the cmdlet produces no output, it should implement a PassThrough parameter
  • If the cmdlet makes changes or has side effects, it should implement ShouldProcess and have SupportShouldProcess = true specified in the cmdlet attribute. See a discussion about correct ShouldProcess implementation here
  • Cmdlets should derive from AzureRmCmdlet for management cmdlets, and AzureDataCmdlet for data cmdlets
  • If multiple parameter sets are implemented, the cmdlet should specify a DefaultParameterSetName in its cmdlet attribute

Parameters

  • Cmdlets should have no more than four positional parameters
  • Cmdlet parameter sets should be mutually exclusive - each parameter set must have at least one mandatory parameter not in other parameter sets
  • Parameter types should not expose types from the management library - complex parameter types should be defined in the module
  • Complex parameter types are discouraged - a parameter type should be simple types as often as possible. If complex types are used, they should be shallow and easily creatable from a constructor or another cmdlet
  • Parameters should be explicitly marked as Mandatory or not, and should contain a HelpMessage
  • No parameter is of type object.
    • Management cmdlets should have the following parameters and aliases:
      • ResourceGroupName with (optional) alias to ResourceGroup type string marked as [ValueFromPipelineByPropertyName]
      • Name with alias to ResourceName type string marked as [ValueFromPipelineByPropertyName]
      • Location (if appropriate) type string
      • Tag, type HashTable

Parameters and the Pipeline

  • Complex parameters should take values from the pipeline when possible, and certainly when they match the output type of another cmdlet
  • Only one parameter should use ValueFromPipeline per parameter set; parameters from different parameter sets may have this attribute, but should not be convertible
  • No parameter is of type object
  • Each management cmdlet should have a parameter set that takes ResourceGroupName and Name from the pipeline by property value
  • For a given resource type, it should be possible to pipe the output of Get and New cmdlets to the input of Set, Update, Remove and other action cmdlets for that resource

…ted test case and scenario records

@azurecla
Copy link

azurecla commented Sep 6, 2016

Hi @zhencui, I'm your friendly neighborhood Azure Pull Request Bot (You can call me AZPRBOT). Thanks for your contribution!


It looks like you're working at Microsoft (zhencui). If you're full-time, we DON'T require a contribution license agreement.



If you are a vendor, DO please sign the electronic contribution license agreement. It will take 2 minutes and there's no faxing! https://cla.azure.com.

TTYL, AZPRBOT;

@azuresdkci
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@cormacpayne
Copy link
Member

@zhencui Hey Zhenhua, please merge the latest changes from dev to fix the conflicts

@markcowl
Copy link
Member

markcowl commented Sep 9, 2016

@zhencui There are merge conflicts, please update

@zhencui
Copy link
Contributor Author

zhencui commented Sep 12, 2016

@cormacpayne @markcowl Conflicts have been resolved.

@cormacpayne
Copy link
Member

@azuresdkci add to whitelist

1 similar comment
@shahabhijeet
Copy link
Contributor

@azuresdkci add to whitelist

Mandatory = false,
Position = 1,
ValueFromPipelineByPropertyName = true)]
public string Name { get; set; }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should the remove have an alias for Name property in order to be consistent with the Add-AzureRmVmssDiagnosticsExtension cmdlet Name property?

-ImageReferenceOffer $imgRef.Offer -ImageReferenceSku $imgRef.Skus -ImageReferenceVersion $imgRef.Version `
-ImageReferencePublisher $imgRef.PublisherName -VhdContainer $vhdContainer `
| Add-AzureRmVmssDiagnosticsExtension -Name $extname -SettingFilePath "$TestOutputRoot\ConfigFiles\DiagnosticsExtensionPublicConfig.json" `
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any reason, no tests have not been added for covering rest of the parameters for AddAzureRmVmssdianosticsExtension (e.g. VirtualMachineScaleSet, PrtectedSettingFilePath, TypeHandlerVersion)
If you are planning to add those test later, can you create an issue and link to this PR or if you think those tests are not needed, please mention in the PR.

@zhencui zhencui force-pushed the dev branch 2 times, most recently from 39fcc34 to 7e2557e Compare September 19, 2016 22:04
@cormacpayne
Copy link
Member

@azuresdkci retest this please

@markcowl
Copy link
Member

@zhencui The PR is failing due to cmdlet signature issues for the two new cmdlets caught by the static analysis tools. I have placed comments in the two cmdlets that need to be changed. See http://azuresdkci.cloudapp.net/job/powershell/6512/artifact/src/Package/SignatureIssues.csv for the static analysis report.

@cormacpayne
Copy link
Member

@zhencui the following test is failing:

Microsoft.Azure.Commands.Compute.Test.ScenarioTests.DiagnosticsExtensionTests.TestVmssDiagnosticsExtension

@cormacpayne
Copy link
Member

@zhencui Hey Zhenhua, would you mind pulling from dev to get the latest changes that fix the on-demand build?

@cormacpayne
Copy link
Member


if (diagnosticsExtensions.Any())
{
if (Force.IsPresent ||
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this really necessary? Seems liek the ShouldContinue is going to happen every time anythiung is deleted, so not much of a reason for the prompt or for the Force parameter. I would remove it.

@markcowl
Copy link
Member

@zhencui One comment on the lack of need for Force parameter. Otherwise LGTM

@cormacpayne
Copy link
Member

@cormacpayne cormacpayne merged commit 11c5d20 into Azure:dev Sep 22, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants