-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
Update to R4.5 RP standard (#24) #9762
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
* NFSAAS-2898 update to R4.5 RP standard * NFSAAS-2898 update to R4.5 RP standard
@niander or @cormacpayne static analysis still fails despite adding the breaking changes file (as detailed in the old PR that this one replaced, #9680) |
* NFSAAS-2898 update to R4.5 RP standard * NFSAAS-2898 update to R4.5 RP standard * NFSAAS-2898 update to R4.5 RP standard
Static analysis now fixed. But core Test Windows has a failure. Please advise on that. Well, there is a test failure, maybe related to that. |
The problem was from test failure. Note that I have now commented out this test. It fails in the playback mode despite no changes. I'm unable to record a new one due to external setup required in the subscription, which I always expected to be a problem. |
Update active directory test
Add test back in. New test record available.
I was able to record the failing test again and added it back in. Review required. |
Any chance of a review soon. This is quite overdue for the ANF R4.5 GA release. Thanks. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for late response, here are my general opinions
- Please make sure to check all the checklist if applicable before requesting a review
- Please provide a more clearer title and description. For example, an internal ticket number in the title doesn't help reviewer understand your intentions
@isra-fel ready for re-review. Thanks. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@leonardbf a couple of minor comments, otherwise LGTM
@isra-fel anything else that needs to be changed from what you can see?
Nothing more from my side @cormacpayne , thank you 👍 |
Any chance of re-review and maybe merge? Thanks. |
Comments addressed and signed-off on
Supercedes #9680
Addition of ProtocolType and MountTarget
Internal ticket NFSAAS-2898
Description
Checklist
CONTRIBUTING.md
platyPS
module