Skip to content

Non-root dockerfile #61

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 20, 2024
Merged

Non-root dockerfile #61

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 20, 2024

Conversation

csikb
Copy link
Collaborator

@csikb csikb commented Mar 20, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Streamlined the build process and runtime environment setup in the Docker configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The modifications to the Dockerfile entail a comprehensive reorganization of the build process, focusing on optimizing the builder stage and refining the directory structure. Key updates include the rearrangement of WORKDIR directives to enhance the build flow, the introduction of a new user for improved security, and adjustments to paths to facilitate a more efficient setup for both build and runtime environments. These changes collectively aim to streamline the Docker container's configuration and operation.

Changes

Files Change Summary
Dockerfile - Reorganized builder stage
- Updated WORKDIR directives
- Added new user
- Modified paths for optimized build and runtime setup

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@csikb csikb changed the title Feature/nonroot dockerfile Non-root dockerfile Mar 20, 2024
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@csikb csikb added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 20, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (cfd909b) to head (a7d65e9).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #61   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           10        10           
  Lines          193       193           
=========================================
  Hits           193       193           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cfd909b and 0a77b99.
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • docker-compose.yml is excluded by: !**/*.yml
Files selected for processing (1)
  • Dockerfile (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 10
Dockerfile (10)
  • 1-1: The base image is updated to python:3.12. Ensure that all dependencies and the application are fully compatible with Python 3.12.
  • 3-3: The WORKDIR is set to /builder in the build stage, which is a clear and logical choice for separating the build environment.
  • 19-22: Adding a non-root user (nonroot) and setting the user for subsequent commands enhances the security of the Docker container by limiting permissions. This is a best practice for Docker images.
  • 23-23: Setting the WORKDIR to /home/nonroot/app for the application stage is consistent with the non-root user approach and helps in organizing the application files.
  • 34-35: Copying the wheels and requirements.txt from the builder stage to the application stage is done correctly. This ensures that dependencies are isolated and pre-built in the builder stage, which can improve build times and consistency.
  • 34-36: Ensure that the pip install command installing wheels from the local directory (./wheels/*) does not inadvertently install unwanted or malicious packages. It's good practice to explicitly list the packages to be installed or verify the contents of the wheels directory.
  • 34-36: Consider using a more specific version of the base image (e.g., python:3.12-slim-buster) to ensure more predictable builds and mitigate potential issues arising from unexpected changes in the base image.
  • 34-36: The CMD directive specifies the command to run the application using uvicorn. Ensure that the application's dependencies are fully compatible with the Python version used and that uvicorn is included in the requirements.txt.
  • 34-36: Exposing port 80 is appropriate for a web application. However, consider if there's a need to support HTTPS directly within the container or if it will be handled externally (e.g., by a reverse proxy). If HTTPS support is required, additional configuration may be necessary.
  • 34-36: The use of labels to provide metadata about the image is a good practice. Ensure that the information provided is accurate and up-to-date, especially the license (GPL-3.0), which should match the project's actual license.

Merged via the queue into main with commit a577588 Mar 20, 2024
@csikb csikb deleted the feature/nonroot-dockerfile branch March 20, 2024 11:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants