-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
Do not add the same tag multiple times #423
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -132,4 +132,16 @@ public function testNonStrictEmptyTag() | |
$this->assertTrue($tagHandler->hasTags()); | ||
$this->assertEquals('post-1', $tagHandler->getTagsHeaderValue()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
public function testUniqueTags() | ||
{ | ||
$headerFormatter = new CommaSeparatedTagHeaderFormatter('FOS-Tags'); | ||
|
||
$tagHandler = new ResponseTagger(['header_formatter' => $headerFormatter, 'strict' => true]); | ||
$tagHandler->addTags(['post-1', 'post-2', 'post-1']); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. for the sake of completeness, i'd like to have another line here that does |
||
$tagHandler->addTags(['post-2', 'post-3']); | ||
$this->assertTrue($tagHandler->hasTags()); | ||
|
||
$this->assertEquals('post-1,post-2,post-3', $tagHandler->getTagsHeaderValue()); | ||
} | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i am pondering whether we should do the unique only at the end when building the tags header. not sure whats better performance - doing unique only at the end in getTagsHeaderValue would add less overhead for people who's system is not adding duplicate tags. on the other hand, a system with massive duplicates would profit from a rolling de-duplication. also depends on whether addTags is called a lot or only a few times... wdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I asked myself the same question but in the end I guess it's such a minor thing, nobody will ever notice 😄 I put it into the
addTags()
because there's already some filtering going on there. I just figured it would be better to add it there so it's all in one place. But again, at the end of the day it doesn't really matter I think 😊There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, agreed