-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 655
Better switching to git flow story #308
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Better switching to git flow story #308
Conversation
@SimonCropp @andreasohlund @gep13 would love a review on this too |
Out at a wedding today/tonight but will try and have a look tomorrow. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Jake Ginnivanmailto:[email protected] @SimonCropp @andreasohlund @gep13 would love a review on this too Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: |
why the removal of short version. i thought that concept was a good way of avoiding accidents of thinking you were dealing with a full semver in scenarios where that was actually not possible |
The issue is that we are using it to store git tags, which breaks for 4 part versions and git tags which have pre-release tags. Seemed like it got in the way and while we may have additional information floating around at some points we create a new Semantic Version in each of the different version finders taking the bits we actually care about. |
Ok fair enough. Everything else looks good |
I'm rebasing now. Another motivation is to simplify, we could reintroduce but make it a wrapper for SemanticVersion which hides information rather than another type/parser etc |
Nah lets not sweat the wrapper. Let go with this for now. In theory if we have good enough integrations tests it should be a non issue |
Yeah, that is what I thought. Hence the other PR, I think coverage is getting pretty good now |
dc42b20
to
5d55a34
Compare
Rebased |
Better switching to git flow story
Fixes #296