Skip to content

Better switching to git flow story #308

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

JakeGinnivan
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #296

@JakeGinnivan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@SimonCropp @andreasohlund @gep13 would love a review on this too

@gep13
Copy link
Member

gep13 commented Nov 29, 2014

Out at a wedding today/tonight but will try and have a look tomorrow.

Sent from my Windows Phone


From: Jake Ginnivanmailto:[email protected]
Sent: ‎29/‎11/‎2014 14:21
To: ParticularLabs/GitVersionmailto:[email protected]
Cc: Gary Ewan Parkmailto:[email protected]
Subject: Re: [GitVersion] Better switching to git flow story (#308)

@SimonCropp @andreasohlund @gep13 would love a review on this too


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#308 (comment)

@SimonCropp
Copy link
Contributor

why the removal of short version. i thought that concept was a good way of avoiding accidents of thinking you were dealing with a full semver in scenarios where that was actually not possible

@JakeGinnivan
Copy link
Contributor Author

The issue is that we are using it to store git tags, which breaks for 4 part versions and git tags which have pre-release tags.

Seemed like it got in the way and while we may have additional information floating around at some points we create a new Semantic Version in each of the different version finders taking the bits we actually care about.

@SimonCropp
Copy link
Contributor

Ok fair enough. Everything else looks good

@JakeGinnivan
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm rebasing now. Another motivation is to simplify, we could reintroduce but make it a wrapper for SemanticVersion which hides information rather than another type/parser etc

@SimonCropp
Copy link
Contributor

Nah lets not sweat the wrapper. Let go with this for now. In theory if we have good enough integrations tests it should be a non issue

@JakeGinnivan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, that is what I thought. Hence the other PR, I think coverage is getting pretty good now

@JakeGinnivan JakeGinnivan force-pushed the BetterSwitchingToGitFlowStory branch from dc42b20 to 5d55a34 Compare November 30, 2014 11:09
@JakeGinnivan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased

JakeGinnivan added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2014
@JakeGinnivan JakeGinnivan merged commit 12359cc into GitTools:master Dec 4, 2014
@JakeGinnivan JakeGinnivan deleted the BetterSwitchingToGitFlowStory branch December 4, 2014 07:24
@gep13 gep13 added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Dec 9, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve story for adding GitVersion into legacy repository
3 participants