-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 354
create new and working release #1971
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
I am not at all sure, but I've included some information about my observations in #1970 (reply in thread) that makes me wonder if maybe not everything has to be yanked and redone. |
That way breakage upon release can be avoided, for sure.
…lidate v0.10.0, gix-path v0.10.17, gix-features v0.42.1, gix-hash v0.18.0, gix-hashtable v0.8.1, gix-object v0.49.1, gix-glob v0.20.0, gix-quote v0.6.0, gix-attributes v0.26.0, gix-command v0.6.0, gix-packetline-blocking v0.19.0, gix-filter v0.19.1, gix-fs v0.15.0, gix-commitgraph v0.28.0, gix-revwalk v0.20.1, gix-traverse v0.46.1, gix-worktree-stream v0.21.1, gix-archive v0.21.1, gix-tempfile v17.1.0, gix-lock v17.1.0, gix-index v0.40.0, gix-config-value v0.15.0, gix-pathspec v0.11.0, gix-ignore v0.15.0, gix-worktree v0.41.0, gix-diff v0.52.1, gix-blame v0.2.1, gix-ref v0.52.1, gix-sec v0.11.0, gix-config v0.45.1, gix-prompt v0.11.0, gix-url v0.31.0, gix-credentials v0.29.0, gix-discover v0.40.1, gix-dir v0.14.1, gix-mailmap v0.27.1, gix-revision v0.34.1, gix-merge v0.5.1, gix-negotiate v0.20.1, gix-pack v0.59.1, gix-odb v0.69.1, gix-refspec v0.30.1, gix-shallow v0.4.0, gix-packetline v0.19.0, gix-transport v0.47.0, gix-protocol v0.50.1, gix-status v0.19.1, gix-submodule v0.19.1, gix-worktree-state v0.19.0, gix v0.72.1, gix-fsck v0.11.1, gitoxide-core v0.47.1, gitoxide v0.44.0
Even though a more fine-grained approach might have been possible in theory, I went for the blanket manual yanking as it was supposed to definitely work. This was facilitated by still having the publish logs in the terminal. What's more worrisome is that this happened in the first place - it shouldn't have been possible unless, of course, I somehow managed to not indicate a breaking change in the originating crate again. For now I have no reason to assume this system isn't working at all, but it's clear there are ways to 'work around' it. |
These releases, including for Furthermore, I am not aware of any special reason the Thus, I have gone ahead and run the It occurs to me that there is no descriptive text about the release. However, that appears to have been intentional. (If not intentional, a description can always be added later.) |
Thank you! Indeed I have just forgotten it (again). |
Tasks
cargo set-version --bump minor -p <crate>
to the rescue)