Skip to content

Add workflow to build from conda-forge only #47

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 31, 2024

Conversation

oleksandr-pavlyk
Copy link
Contributor

Build with NumPy 2.0, test with 1.26* and 2.0

Added conda-recipe-cf which does not use numpy-base necessary when working with intel channel

@oleksandr-pavlyk oleksandr-pavlyk force-pushed the build-and-test-with-numpy-2 branch from f59f9f6 to c75a662 Compare July 27, 2024 18:02
Build with NumPy 2.0, test with 1.26* and 2.0

Added conda-recipe-cf which does not use numpy-base
necessary when working with intel channel
@oleksandr-pavlyk oleksandr-pavlyk force-pushed the build-and-test-with-numpy-2 branch 2 times, most recently from 7561aa6 to c7fe11b Compare July 29, 2024 11:59
@oleksandr-pavlyk oleksandr-pavlyk marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2024 14:36
@ekomarova
Copy link
Collaborator

As far as I can tell from the checks, the package is still building with 1.26, apparently due to the presence of -c https://software.repos.intel.com/python/conda. Intel channel does not seem to allow us to build mkl_random with numpy 2.* because of the presence of numpy 1.26 there, even though it is the second in the chain of channels

@oleksandr-pavlyk
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ekomarova The internal CI and conda-package workflow are building with NumPy 1.26 and run tests with it. The conda-package-cf workflow builds with 2.0, and tests with 1.26 and 2.0.

@oleksandr-pavlyk oleksandr-pavlyk merged commit dd1350b into master Jul 31, 2024
41 checks passed
@oleksandr-pavlyk oleksandr-pavlyk deleted the build-and-test-with-numpy-2 branch July 31, 2024 13:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants