Use Aqua for project quality checks

[jishnub]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 32.35% // Head: 17.36% // Decreases project coverage by -14.99% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (4f448bc) compared to base (3975a6a).
Patch coverage: 16.66% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #197       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   32.35%   17.36%   -15.00%     
===========================================
  Files          77       77               
  Lines        7912     7890       -22     
===========================================
- Hits         2560     1370     -1190     
- Misses       5352     6520     +1168     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/ApproxFunBase.jl	66.66% <ø> (ø)
src/Domain.jl	39.68% <ø> (-17.47%)	⬇️
src/Multivariate/TensorSpace.jl	8.00% <0.00%> (-2.00%)	⬇️
src/Operators/Operator.jl	24.93% <ø> (-16.63%)	⬇️
src/Operators/systems.jl	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/PDE/PDE.jl	0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/Operators/SubOperator.jl	16.23% <100.00%> (-22.32%)	⬇️
src/onehotvector.jl	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
src/Operators/general/PartialInverseOperator.jl	0.00% <0.00%> (-96.43%)	⬇️
src/LinearAlgebra/standardchop.jl	0.00% <0.00%> (-91.49%)	⬇️
... and 41 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[jishnub]

Coverage reduction is because I've moved tests from here to ApproxFunOrthogonalPolynomials to avoid circular dependency (JuliaApproximation/ApproxFunOrthogonalPolynomials.jl#104). Since we include downstream tests in computing coverage, this should catch up after versions are bumped downstream.