Skip to content

CompatHelper: bump compat for IrrationalConstants to 0.2, (keep existing compat) #491

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request changes the compat entry for the IrrationalConstants package from 0.1 to 0.1, 0.2.
This keeps the compat entries for earlier versions.

Note: I have not tested your package with this new compat entry.
It is your responsibility to make sure that your package tests pass before you merge this pull request.

@theogf theogf force-pushed the compathelper/new_version/2023-02-21-01-09-15-337-00122106565 branch from 6b57e35 to b4fb67e Compare February 21, 2023 01:09
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 21, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 94.25% // Head: 94.25% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (7c9b31d) compared to base (768207c).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #491   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.25%   94.25%           
=======================================
  Files          52       52           
  Lines        1374     1374           
=======================================
  Hits         1295     1295           
  Misses         79       79           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@willtebbutt
Copy link
Member

Do not merge yet -- IrrationalConstants being held back by something. Am investigating

@willtebbutt willtebbutt reopened this Feb 21, 2023
@willtebbutt
Copy link
Member

Appears to update locally. Closed + re-opened to re-run CI.

@devmotion
Copy link
Member

Needs SpecialFunctions, StatsFuns, etc. I assume we might depend on one of these.

@willtebbutt
Copy link
Member

Yup. Looks like it's SpecialFunctions. Looks like it's compatible with version 1 of SpecialFunctions, but not 2. Looks like you've already opened the relevant PR, so we'll just have to wait for that to be merged

@willtebbutt willtebbutt reopened this Feb 22, 2023
@willtebbutt
Copy link
Member

Version 0.2 of IrrationalConstants is now being used in CI. Will merge when CI passes

@devmotion
Copy link
Member

Are you sure? https://github.com/JuliaGaussianProcesses/KernelFunctions.jl/actions/runs/4242302919/jobs/7373628447#step:6:96 seems to indicate it still uses IrrationalConstants 0.1 (not too surprised since e.g. StatsFuns and DiffRules are not updated yet).

@willtebbutt
Copy link
Member

Ahhh I didn't look far enough through the logs -- looks like 0.2 is getting installed, then downgraded to 0.1. Good catch

@willtebbutt willtebbutt reopened this Feb 23, 2023
@devmotion
Copy link
Member

The possibly last missing package should be ChainRules. I already released updates of SpecialFunctions, StatsFuns, and DiffRules. The ChainRules PR had quite a few test failures but all of them should be unrelated.

Copy link
Member

@devmotion devmotion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@willtebbutt
Copy link
Member

We appear to have sporadic test failures for the FBM kernel -- this is presumably a tricky numerical issue. I've loosened the tolerance in the hope that tests will all pass. Will merge if they do.

@willtebbutt willtebbutt merged commit f178d7b into master Feb 23, 2023
@willtebbutt willtebbutt deleted the compathelper/new_version/2023-02-21-01-09-15-337-00122106565 branch February 23, 2023 11:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants