Skip to content

Improve some LAPACK test coverage #113

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2023
Merged

Improve some LAPACK test coverage #113

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2023

Conversation

andreasnoack
Copy link
Member

and fix some issues.

Closes #5

@andreasnoack andreasnoack enabled auto-merge March 21, 2023 10:51
@andreasnoack andreasnoack added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 21, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 21, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 85.71% and project coverage change: +5.54 🎉

Comparison is base (ef815d6) 82.81% compared to head (0c3d3e1) 88.36%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #113      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.81%   88.36%   +5.54%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines        1653     1650       -3     
==========================================
+ Hits         1369     1458      +89     
+ Misses        284      192      -92     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/lapack.jl 87.08% <85.71%> (+33.43%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@andreasnoack andreasnoack merged commit 20a7736 into master Mar 21, 2023
@andreasnoack andreasnoack deleted the an/testlapack branch March 21, 2023 11:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make test coverage decent
1 participant