Skip to content

Fix tests (hopefully) #182

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 5, 2024
Merged

Fix tests (hopefully) #182

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 5, 2024

Conversation

dlfivefifty
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.03%. Comparing base (f2fe965) to head (42b877f).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #182      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.32%   83.03%   +0.71%     
==========================================
  Files          11       12       +1     
  Lines        1420     1509      +89     
==========================================
+ Hits         1169     1253      +84     
- Misses        251      256       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dlfivefifty
Copy link
Member Author

@DanielVandH I think this has hit a bug in the UL code?

@dlfivefifty
Copy link
Member Author

oh wait.... the failure is actually in infqr

@dlfivefifty
Copy link
Member Author

Hmm... there's a bug in banded matrix broadcasting that is only triggered on MacOS on CI that's breaking a lot of tests.... not sure how to debug it.

@dlfivefifty dlfivefifty merged commit 53f0325 into master Jun 5, 2024
6 checks passed
@dlfivefifty dlfivefifty deleted the dl/updatetests branch June 5, 2024 09:03
@DanielVandH
Copy link
Contributor

Weird. I don't believe my code touched any of that. The only relevant recent change would be JuliaArrays/LazyArrays.jl@052a0f6 I think? But nothing there looks like it would ever cause some OS-dependent issue. The manifests between each OS are the same too so that's weird.

@dlfivefifty
Copy link
Member Author

Right it couldn't have been your code and this bug has been popping up elsewhere. I've tried setting random seeds, etc., but nothing makes it reliably triggered.

All the banded broadcast should be Julia code. So it shouldn't be an issue with BLAS or LAPACK.

The fact that its an out-of-band error kind of rules at the possibility of an array not being set values. Why would this impact sparsity?

So I'm at a complete loss. I just hope it's some weird issue with the CI setup but I can't imagine what it would be. I've successfully debugged CI bugs by adding print statements but I don't think I have the motivation right now to investigate it...

@DanielVandH
Copy link
Contributor

I've had some array access issues like this before with DelaunayTriangulation.jl with CI bugs that are completely non-existent locally. It took a lot of print debugging and care to get the environment correctly setup to somehow identify the cause (and now the tests just include thousands of random tests everywhere which is a bit annoying)... if it continues to be a problem I can try and look into it if necessary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants