Skip to content

Mention implementation in FastTransforms.jl #29

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 24, 2020

Conversation

antoine-levitt
Copy link
Contributor

@giordano
Copy link
Member

I think this feature is not in a stable release of FastTransforms.jl, though.

@daanhb
Copy link

daanhb commented May 28, 2019

Mentioning FastTransforms is fine with me, pending a release indeed, but please note that the implementation in FastTransforms.jl is really just a minimal stub that has the right complexity. For example, there are only fake dummy plans to support the interface, and the in-place routines just call the non-inplace routines and copy the data.

If people do pick it up, I hope that creates enough incentive to complete an FFTW-like implementation to provide a much better experience.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants