Skip to content

Jishnub sparseneg int der #413

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
May 31, 2022

Conversation

jverzani
Copy link
Member

  • fix integrate, derivative with SparsePolynomial
  • fix bug found in integrate with LaurentPolynomial
  • add new abstract type LaurentBasisPolynomial <: StandardBasisPolynomial

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 31, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #413 (959a421) into master (095c3ba) will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #413      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.77%   83.72%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          23       23              
  Lines        2799     2784      -15     
==========================================
- Hits         2345     2331      -14     
+ Misses        454      453       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/common.jl 90.08% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
src/polynomials/LaurentPolynomial.jl 96.02% <100.00%> (+0.68%) ⬆️
src/polynomials/SparsePolynomial.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/polynomials/standard-basis.jl 88.25% <100.00%> (+0.12%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 095c3ba...959a421. Read the comment docs.

@jverzani jverzani merged commit 5574b86 into JuliaMath:master May 31, 2022
@jverzani jverzani deleted the jishnub-sparseneg-int-der branch May 31, 2022 16:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants