Skip to content

feature: option for checkboxes to not hide bullets #423

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
bendavis78 opened this issue May 11, 2025 · 1 comment
Closed

feature: option for checkboxes to not hide bullets #423

bendavis78 opened this issue May 11, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@bendavis78
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

When checkbox is enabled, it hides bullets (regardless of whether bullets are enabled).

Describe the solution you'd like

Add a boolean option to checkbox config called hide_bullet, allow setting it to false

Describe alternatives you've considered

N/A

Additional information

No response

@bendavis78 bendavis78 added the enhancement New feature or request label May 11, 2025
MeanderingProgrammer added a commit that referenced this issue May 12, 2025
## Details

Request: #423

Adds `checkbox.bullet` option which defaults to `false`. When `false`
the bullet point is hidden, maintaining the current behavior. When
`true` we execute the bullet point render logic in addition to the
checkbox render logic.
@MeanderingProgrammer
Copy link
Owner

That is the "standard" way markdown is rendered, if you have both lists and checkboxes like this:

- test list item
- [x] test checked checkbox

This is how github renders it:

  • test list item
  • test checked checkbox

With the list item having a bullet point and the checkbox hiding the bullet point.

I did add the option here: a1b0988

But the option name under the checkbox config is bullet, and you set it to true if you want the bullet point to be rendered (the default value is false).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants