Skip to content

Corrected "stosb" typo #4627

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2023
Merged

Corrected "stosb" typo #4627

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2023

Conversation

MAP233224
Copy link
Contributor

Under the "Syntax" section, "__stosb" was being used instead of the correct "__stosq".

Under the "Syntax" section, "__stosb" was being used instead of the correct "__stosq".
@prmerger-automator
Copy link
Contributor

@MAP233224 : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit d282514:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
docs/intrinsics/stosq.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

For any questions, please:

@Court72
Copy link
Contributor

Court72 commented Jul 11, 2023

@TylerMSFT

Can you review the proposed changes?

When the changes are ready for publication, add a #sign-off comment to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged Tracking label for the PR review team label Jul 11, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@TylerMSFT TylerMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for catching that and fixing it.

@TylerMSFT
Copy link
Collaborator

#sign-off

@TylerMSFT TylerMSFT merged commit 4e67def into MicrosoftDocs:main Jul 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants