Skip to content

[TASK] Use more real-life data in a unit test #952

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 18, 2025

Conversation

oliverklee
Copy link
Collaborator

This makes the test easier to read. Also, this prepares for when an AtRuleBlockList might not allow an empty type anymore.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 18, 2025

Coverage Status

coverage: 51.335%. remained the same
when pulling dbdab6a on task/improve-test-examples
into 0079925 on main.

This makes the test easier to read. Also, this prepares for
when an `AtRuleBlockList` might not allow an empty type
anymore.
@oliverklee oliverklee force-pushed the task/improve-test-examples branch from 78e292e to dbdab6a Compare February 18, 2025 16:30
Copy link
Collaborator

@JakeQZ JakeQZ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 to the Foo Fighters :)

@JakeQZ JakeQZ merged commit d71ff28 into main Feb 18, 2025
21 checks passed
@JakeQZ JakeQZ deleted the task/improve-test-examples branch February 18, 2025 16:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants