Skip to content

Bump a bunch of versions #71

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2023

Conversation

bollwyvl
Copy link
Contributor

Hey folks! I tried getting the local dev machinery set up, but ran into a bunch of issues... in looking into said issues, I found some of them had been fixed by newer versions.

This PR just gets to a happier dependency/setup place so that subsequent PRs aren't quite as involved.

Changes

  • bump up blockly to 9
    • uses much improved, first-class upstream typings, less (Partial)JSONObject
    • add name to theme
  • bump many dev dependencies, notably:
    • @jupyterlab/builder to avoid verdaccio, etc.
    • lerna (5.x not supported anymore)
    • use jlpm all over
      • remove extra yarn
      • remove extra run in commands
      • add yarn-deduplicate
    • typescript just because
    • update tsconfigs a bit
      • target: es2018
      • use references for single watch
  • bump up binder python
    • default's 3.10 anyway, now
  • pin jupyterlite==0.1.0b18 (it's going to get a bit bumpy for a sec)

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Binder 👈 Launch a Binder on branch bollwyvl/jupyterlab-blockly/bump-a-bunch-of-versions

@hbcarlos
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you so much, @bollwyvl!

@bollwyvl bollwyvl marked this pull request as ready for review March 14, 2023 13:02
@bollwyvl
Copy link
Contributor Author

Well, I don't know what releaser is going on about, or why it's npm packing a private package. But otherwise, this seems pretty ready to go to get on to other work.

@hbcarlos
Copy link
Contributor

Well, I don't know what releaser is going on about, or why it's npm packing a private package. But otherwise, this seems pretty ready to go to get on to other work.

Yes, I looked a little bit at the PR, and it looks good. Thanks, @bollwyvl.
Don't worry about the releaser; I'll take a look at that.

Copy link
Contributor

@hbcarlos hbcarlos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@hbcarlos hbcarlos merged commit 0cf2339 into QuantStack:main Mar 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants