Timestamp operation #249
Merged
Timestamp operation #249
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
RxJava-pull-requests #109 FAILURE |
|
The failing test has nothing to do with my changes. - I guess it's a sporadic test problem as there's not much difference between 10 and 30 milliseconds... |
|
This should also be added to |
|
RxJava-pull-requests #112 FAILURE |
|
My Eclipse configuration also automatically added a lot of |
|
The '@OverRide' annotations are fine - they are standard Java. They may be missing in some places because this project started with Java 5 compliance and it had the annotations in less places than Java 6. |
rickbw
pushed a commit
to rickbw/RxJava
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2014
Timestamp operation
jihoonson
pushed a commit
to jihoonson/RxJava
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2020
…actory-methods Additional factory methods - issue ReactiveX#249
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Straightforward implementation of issue #93, based on
OperationMap(without the scheduler version, asmapdoesn't take a scheduler yet either).