-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.6k
save allocation in OperatorSkipTimed #4239
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
94 changes: 94 additions & 0 deletions
94
src/main/java/rx/internal/operators/OnSubscribeSkipTimed.java
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ | ||
/** | ||
* Copyright 2014 Netflix, Inc. | ||
* | ||
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not | ||
* use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of | ||
* the License at | ||
* | ||
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
* | ||
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT | ||
* WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the | ||
* License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under | ||
* the License. | ||
*/ | ||
package rx.internal.operators; | ||
|
||
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit; | ||
|
||
import rx.Observable.OnSubscribe; | ||
import rx.Observable; | ||
import rx.Scheduler; | ||
import rx.Scheduler.Worker; | ||
import rx.Subscriber; | ||
import rx.functions.Action0; | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Skips elements until a specified time elapses. | ||
* @param <T> the value type | ||
*/ | ||
public final class OnSubscribeSkipTimed<T> implements OnSubscribe<T> { | ||
final long time; | ||
final TimeUnit unit; | ||
final Scheduler scheduler; | ||
final Observable<T> source; | ||
|
||
public OnSubscribeSkipTimed(Observable<T> source, long time, TimeUnit unit, Scheduler scheduler) { | ||
this.source = source; | ||
this.time = time; | ||
this.unit = unit; | ||
this.scheduler = scheduler; | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public void call(final Subscriber<? super T> child) { | ||
final Worker worker = scheduler.createWorker(); | ||
SkipTimedSubscriber<T> subscriber = new SkipTimedSubscriber<T>(child); | ||
subscriber.add(worker); | ||
child.add(subscriber); | ||
worker.schedule(subscriber, time, unit); | ||
source.unsafeSubscribe(subscriber); | ||
} | ||
|
||
final static class SkipTimedSubscriber<T> extends Subscriber<T> implements Action0 { | ||
|
||
final Subscriber<? super T> child; | ||
volatile boolean gate; | ||
|
||
SkipTimedSubscriber(Subscriber<? super T> child) { | ||
this.child = child; | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public void call() { | ||
gate = true; | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public void onNext(T t) { | ||
if (gate) { | ||
child.onNext(t); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public void onError(Throwable e) { | ||
try { | ||
child.onError(e); | ||
} finally { | ||
unsubscribe(); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public void onCompleted() { | ||
try { | ||
child.onCompleted(); | ||
} finally { | ||
unsubscribe(); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
} | ||
} |
80 changes: 0 additions & 80 deletions
80
src/main/java/rx/internal/operators/OperatorSkipTimed.java
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
child.add(subscriber)
missing.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah oops, thank you @akarnokd . I just need to add super(child) in the
SkipTimedSubscriber
constructor. You mentioning that makes me realize that there is probably a backpressure related bug in the existing operator in as much as when we don't emit to the child we should request another (likefilter
). I'll write a unit test for unsubscription as penance and another to demonstrate the backpressure problem (if it exists).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's wrong because it calls
unsubscribe
in theonError
/onCompleted
path and unsubscribes the child. Theworker
should be added tosubscriber
instead andsubscriber
added to thechild
. No constructor forwarding.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It doesn't support backpressure:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Constructor forwarding handles requests for us too though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That would lead to hot spinning for the duration of the time skip.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah I'm with you, thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
actually maybe I'm not with you yet. The alternative is to request
Long.MAX_VALUE
and it might still spin like crazy in an upstream operator. It just doesn't seem different fromfilter
...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Requesting 1 each time incurs an atomic increment costing 22-45 cycle overhead. For filter, the element count is the main deciding factor. For skip its time which can translate to arbitrary element count. The problem is you can't know what the source is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's assuming that the predicate doesn't use time.
I'm not sure why we wouldn't accept the atomic increment cost as the price to have this operator support backpressure.