Normalize semaphore samples and add them to the CI #176
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
|
Reverted the prefix for the |
No, LGTM, thank you! |
wedsonaf
approved these changes
Apr 11, 2021
You're welcome! :) |
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2024
When CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG is enabled, the following warning may be noticed: [ 48.299584] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 48.300092] alloc_tag was not set [ 48.300528] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1361 at include/linux/alloc_tag.h:130 alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook+0x84/0xc7 [ 48.301305] Modules linked in: [ 48.301553] CPU: 2 PID: 1361 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 6.10.0-rc1-00003-gac8755535862 #176 [ 48.302196] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 [ 48.302752] RIP: 0010:alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook+0x84/0xc7 [ 48.303169] Code: 8d 1c c4 48 85 db 74 4d 48 83 3b 00 75 1e 80 3d 65 02 86 04 00 75 15 48 c7 c7 11 48 1d 85 c6 05 55 02 86 04 01 e8 64 44 a5 ff <0f> 0b 48 8b 03 48 85 c0 74 21 48 83 f8 01 74 14 48 8b 50 20 48 f7 [ 48.304411] RSP: 0018:ffff8880111b7d40 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 48.304916] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88800fcc9008 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 48.305455] RDX: 0000000080000000 RSI: ffff888014060000 RDI: ffffed1002236f97 [ 48.305979] RBP: 0000000000001100 R08: fffffbfff0aa73a1 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 48.306473] R10: ffffffff814515e5 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffff88800fcc9000 [ 48.306943] R13: ffff88800b2e5cc0 R14: ffff8880111b7d90 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 48.307529] FS: 00007faf5d1908c0(0000) GS:ffff88806cf00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 48.308223] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 48.308710] CR2: 000058fb220c9118 CR3: 00000000110cc000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 [ 48.309274] PKRU: 55555554 [ 48.309804] Call Trace: [ 48.310029] <TASK> [ 48.310290] ? show_regs+0x84/0x8d [ 48.310722] ? alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook+0x84/0xc7 [ 48.311298] ? __warn+0x13b/0x2ff [ 48.311580] ? alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook+0x84/0xc7 [ 48.311987] ? report_bug+0x2ce/0x3ab [ 48.312292] ? handle_bug+0x8c/0x107 [ 48.312563] ? exc_invalid_op+0x34/0x6f [ 48.312842] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 48.313173] ? this_cpu_in_panic+0x1c/0x72 [ 48.313503] ? alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook+0x84/0xc7 [ 48.313880] ? putname+0x143/0x14e [ 48.314152] kmem_cache_free+0xe9/0x214 [ 48.314454] putname+0x143/0x14e [ 48.314712] do_unlinkat+0x413/0x45e [ 48.315001] ? __pfx_do_unlinkat+0x10/0x10 [ 48.315388] ? __check_object_size+0x4d7/0x525 [ 48.315744] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x20/0x4a [ 48.316167] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x20/0x4a [ 48.316757] ? getname_flags+0x4ed/0x500 [ 48.317261] __x64_sys_unlink+0x42/0x4a [ 48.317741] do_syscall_64+0xe2/0x149 [ 48.318171] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 48.318602] RIP: 0033:0x7faf5d8850ab [ 48.318891] Code: fd ff ff e8 27 dd 01 00 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 5f 00 00 00 0f 05 c3 0f 1f 40 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 57 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 05 c3 0f 1f 40 00 48 8b 15 41 2d 0e 00 f7 d8 [ 48.320649] RSP: 002b:00007ffc44982b38 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000057 [ 48.321182] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005ba344a44680 RCX: 00007faf5d8850ab [ 48.321667] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00005ba344a44430 RDI: 00007ffc44982b40 [ 48.322139] RBP: 00007ffc44982c00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000007 [ 48.322598] R10: 00005ba344a44430 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 48.323071] R13: 00007ffc44982b40 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 48.323596] </TASK> This is due to a race when two objects are allocated from the same slab, which did not have an obj_exts allocated for. In such a case, the two threads will notice the NULL obj_exts and after one assigns slab->obj_exts, the second one will happily do the exchange if it reads this new assigned value. In order to avoid that, verify that the read obj_exts does not point to an allocated obj_exts before doing the exchange. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 09c4656 ("codetag: debug: introduce OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL to mark failed slab_ext allocations") Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <[email protected]> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]> Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]> Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <[email protected]> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]> Cc: Roman Gushchin <[email protected]> Cc: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <[email protected]> Cc: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda [email protected]