forked from torvalds/linux
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 465
Add UserSlicePtrWriter::clear
.
#222
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the documentation should explain the behavior better, i.e. that it will clear no matter what, even if the length is bigger and that the fields will be updated in all cases.
In any case, isn't a bit confusing to do that given
write_raw()
will return without performing any action iflen
is out of bounds? (Which, by the way, should likely be aEINVAL
rather than aEFAULT
, no?)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure. I updated the documentation.
Since
write_raw
doesn't update its internal state to reflect partial writes, it not so problematic at the moment.For
clear
we need to report how much was actually cleared because we want to mimic the behaviour of the C implementation.I agree that it isn't ideal, but I think the solution here is really to update
write_raw
to reflect what was written in its internal state. But since this PR is aboutclear
, I think this should be updated in another PR.Perhaps. But I think
EINVAL
, if bubbled up to userspace, is too generic.EFAULT
is a better indication that the problem is in some address. Also, this is the existing behaviour, I'm just trying to addclear
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! It is clear now.