added csharp code and update documents

[pallavigitwork]

Thanks for contributing to the Selenium site and documentation!
A PR well described will help maintainers to review and merge it quickly

Before submitting your PR, please check our contributing guidelines.
Avoid large PRs, and help reviewers by making them as simple and short as possible.

update csharp code for elements-information

Description

update csharp code for elements-information

Motivation and Context

Types of changes

• Change to the site (I have double-checked the Netlify deployment, and my changes look good)
• Code example added (and I also added the example to all translated languages)
• Improved translation
• Added new translation (and I also added a notice to each document missing translation)

Checklist

• I have read the contributing document.
• I have used hugo to render the site/docs locally and I am sure it works.

[netlify]

👷 Deploy request for selenium-dev pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	62eb91b

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Key issues to review Possible Bug The test method TestInformationCommands does not handle exceptions that might be thrown during WebDriver operations, such as FindElement. It is recommended to include try-catch blocks to handle potential exceptions and ensure the WebDriver is properly disposed of in case of an error. Resource Management The WebDriver instance is only quit at the end of the TestInformationCommands method. If an assertion fails or an exception occurs before driver.Quit(), the WebDriver might not be properly disposed. Consider implementing a finally block or using a using statement to ensure resources are always released.

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible bug	Correct the misuse of Assert.IsNotNull for proper validation of test conditions Ensure that the Assert.IsNotNull method is used correctly by checking for null values instead of using it on primitive types like integers. examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InformationTest.cs [44-47] -Assert.IsNotNull(point.X); -Assert.IsNotNull(height); +Assert.IsNotNull(point); +Assert.IsTrue(height > 0); Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10 Why: The current use of Assert.IsNotNull on primitive types is incorrect. This suggestion corrects a potential bug by ensuring proper validation of test conditions.	10
Enhancement	Improve the reliability of element visibility checks by using explicit waits Replace the implicit wait time with a more robust explicit wait to handle elements that might take longer to load or are dynamically rendered on the page. examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InformationTest.cs [16] -driver.Manage().Timeouts().ImplicitWait = TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(500); +WebDriverWait wait = new WebDriverWait(driver, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10)); +wait.Until(d => d.FindElement(By.Name("email_input")).Displayed); Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Replacing implicit waits with explicit waits can significantly improve the reliability of tests, especially for elements that take longer to load or are dynamically rendered. This is a best practice in Selenium testing.	9
	Add explanatory comments within the CSharp tab for clarity Add a brief description or comment within the CSharp tab explaining what the code block does, enhancing the documentation's clarity and usefulness. website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/elements/information.en.md [116-117] {{< tab header="CSharp" >}} +# Example to check if an element is selected {{< gh-codeblock path="examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InformationTest.cs#L30-L33" >}} Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Adding comments can enhance the clarity and usefulness of the documentation, making it easier for users to understand the purpose of the code blocks. This is a minor enhancement for readability.	6
Best practice	Add error handling in the CSharp code examples to promote best practices Include error handling within the CSharp code examples to demonstrate best practices for exception management in the documentation. website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/elements/information.en.md [191] -{{< gh-codeblock path="examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InformationTest.cs#L40-L47" >}} +try { + {{< gh-codeblock path="examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InformationTest.cs#L40-L47" >}} +} catch (Exception e) { + Console.WriteLine("Error encountered: " + e.Message); +} Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Including error handling demonstrates best practices for exception management, which is important for robust and reliable code. This suggestion significantly improves the quality of the documentation.	8
	Simplify boolean assertions for better readability and maintainability Use Assert.IsTrue directly for boolean conditions to make the assertions more readable and idiomatic. examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InformationTest.cs [23-33] -Assert.AreEqual(isEmailVisible, true); -Assert.AreEqual(isEnabledButton, true); -Assert.AreEqual(isSelectedCheck, true); +Assert.IsTrue(isEmailVisible); +Assert.IsTrue(isEnabledButton); +Assert.IsTrue(isSelectedCheck); Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Using Assert.IsTrue directly for boolean conditions makes the code more readable and idiomatic, which enhances maintainability.	8
Maintainability	Change the path in the gh-codeblock to a relative path for better maintainability Replace the direct path in the gh-codeblock with a relative path to maintain consistency and potentially avoid future issues if the repository structure changes. This will make the documentation more robust to changes in the repository. website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/elements/information.en.md [40] -{{< gh-codeblock path="examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InformationTest.cs#L18-L23" >}} +{{< gh-codeblock path="../../examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InformationTest.cs#L18-L23" >}} Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Using relative paths can improve maintainability and reduce the risk of broken links if the repository structure changes. However, this change is not critical and does not address any functional issues.	7
	Use variables for expected values in assertions to enhance maintainability and configurability Replace hard-coded values in assertions with variables or constants to allow for easier maintenance and configurability. examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InformationTest.cs [38-63] -Assert.AreEqual(tagNameInp, "input"); -Assert.AreEqual(cssValue, "13.3333px"); -Assert.AreEqual(text, "Testing Inputs"); -Assert.AreEqual(valueInfo, "admin@localhost"); +Assert.AreEqual(tagNameInp, expectedTagName); +Assert.AreEqual(cssValue, expectedCssValue); +Assert.AreEqual(text, expectedHeaderText); +Assert.AreEqual(valueInfo, expectedEmailValue); Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Replacing hard-coded values with variables or constants in assertions improves maintainability and configurability, although the current hard-coded values are not incorrect.	7

[harsha509]

Thank you @pallavigitwork !

[pallavigitwork]

Thanks @harsha509 !